THE HINDU, Chennai,
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Chennai: Justice P.R.
Raman of Kochi, a former Judge of the Kerala High Court, will enquire into
allegations of sexual harassment of women and children in Sri Aurobindo Ashram
in Puducherry.
An order to
this effect was passed by Justice K.K. Sasidharan of the Madras High Court on a
writ petition by the ashram trust. The trust was aggrieved by the territorial
government’s action in nominating the Puducherry Collector to enquire into the
ashram affairs following complaints by some ashram inmates and a local
legislator, to flare up the issue.
Mr. Justice
Sasidharan directed the Puducherry Chief Secretary to treat the enquiry officer
(EO) as a State Guest and provide him all required facilities for conducting an
impartial enquiry.
The ashram and
others should extend their cooperation to the officer to hold the enquiry in a
free atmosphere. The inmates should be given full freedom to express their
views and grievances.
The EO would
also enquire whether there was alleged violation of human rights and denial of
fundamental rights to the inmates, whether there was misappropriation of ashram
funds and whether there was truth in the allegation of illegal sale and lease
of ashram property by the trustees.
Counsel
submitted that the ashram was not against any enquiry with regard to the
complaints. Its objection was only against the Collector conducting the enquiry
with a pre-determined mind.
Mr. Justice
Sasidharan said there was no dispute that the ashram was an institution of
international repute. The issues raised by some ashram members, MLA Ashok
Anand, and others should not result in lowering the ashram’s image. The
Ashram’s sanctity should be preserved at any cost. Since the petitioner and the authorities had
agreed on the enquiry by Mr. Justice Raman, he was of the view that the former
Judge should be appointed as EO.
Sathya Sri
Priya Easwaran, an advocate of Kochi, suggested by the EO, has been appointed
to record the statements of women inmates of the ashram.
The High Court
restrained the parties to the writ petition from raising the issues now
referred to the EO in any other forum or in any other manner pending enquiry
proceedings. The EO should conclude the enquiry as expeditiously as possible
and submit a report to the High Court.