From the grammatically inaccurate
term ‘Lives’ gets unleashed this narrative style of insinuations about Sri
Aurobindo – as if the Mystic led double lives, one imagined for him by himself
which his followers and the world began believing as well, while the other
‘human aspect’ to be exclusively discovered through this self-appointed and
ambidextrous style of writing pseudo history. Deshpande shows how each left
handed compliment accompanies a dismissive, negativist, suggestive insinuation
about Sri Aurobindo.
In
fact only when we read R.Y. Deshpande’s Atrocious
Biography, it gets clear how academia and intellectuals get honey trapped
by this irreverence towards a Spiritual Stalwart, forgetting the fact that the
gems they hurry to attest as scintillating insights are from someone who has no
academic grounding, no formal education in history writing and doesn’t even have a
post graduation, least of all a PhD in historiography or any mentionable
qualifications in any other discipline. If we are to go by R.Y. Deshpande, we
are hearing the "brilliant" (!) take of an American ‘taxi cab driver and a high
school dropout’ on one of twentieth century’s most profound Mystic, and a
Cambridge alumni who was proposed the Noble prize for Literature.