There
is a need to define at present what is
not the Integral Yoga of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, more perhaps than
the need to define what it is. Of
course, the two functions are interdependent and cannot be dealt in an
exclusive manner, for one often defines something by what it is not. But the
mere positive definition leaves out the hidden distortions which you only come
to know after a long period of gestation, and not in a one-hour lecture on the
Integral Yoga, however inspiring it may be. There have been in the past, and
there still are a number of brilliant speakers who mostly fulfil their role in
the positive definition of the Yoga and philosophy of Sri Aurobindo and the
Mother, but very few as yet have sufficiently dwelt on its negative definition,
by which I mean explaining elaborately what
it is not. The reason for not doing so is understandable, for if the
speaker did, he would put himself in deep embarrassment, as the question of his
own spiritual worth would immediately come into public scrutiny. How could he
say, for example, that listening to lectures on the Integral Yoga is pretty
useless if one is not keen on practising it? Or that one has to rise beyond the
instincts of the lower vital, when his girl-friend is sitting next to him? Or
that one should not to be attached to physical comforts, when he himself has
been paid for Z-class flight tickets and accommodated in five-star hotels? Unless,
of course, he brazens it out like the clever brahmin who exhorted everybody not
to take onions and garlic, but told his wife that she should continue to use them
at home!
The
gulf between theory and practice is an old fact of spiritual life, and it is
only cheats and hypocrites who deny it. Having said that, I would not find fault
with speakers who are bad practitioners but good exponents of the Integral Yoga,
as long as they are faithful to what the Gurus have said and written. There is
certainly a need for mental clarity, especially when the sheer
comprehensiveness of Sri Aurobindo’s and the Mother’s spirituality permits so
many errors and distortions. These errors, mind you, have been first pointed
out by them, for I take my stand on what they have said and written, and not on
any fresh discoveries I claim to have made. But I say this with diffidence (and
accept my own share of possible error) because the trend now is to put
everything in their names in order to justify the most indefensible actions. The
meaning of spirituality also has been tweaked and stretched beyond recognition,
and made to include almost everything under the sun from environmental concerns
to baby production, flood relief work to water sports, and animal welfare to
transgender issues. Not that these matters should be excluded from the larger
spiritual world-view, but this very all-inclusiveness has resulted in a kind of
freewheeling and even fraudulent spirituality, which is certainly suspect by
all standards of common sense,
especially when there is a considerable involvement of sex and money. It is
here that I would like to state a few examples of spiritual distortion to
illustrate my point.
All Life is Yoga
is one of those oft quoted sayings of Sri Aurobindo, which has perhaps become
the grossest misrepresentation in practice of what it actually is in theory. All Life is Yoga obviously does not mean
that the ordinary life, lived in the ordinary way, with the ordinary
motivations of life, is Yoga. It means that All Life, that is, all the
activities of Life, including the most mundane ones, such as going to the
market and even brushing one’s teeth, can be taken as part of Yoga. That even
one’s relations with others can be made part of Yoga, and if one is not yet
ready to rise beyond one’s desires and ambitions (which is usually the case
with half-baked sadhaks like us), one practises the Yoga despite one’s
limitations. But certainly one does not pretend that the very fulfilment of
one’s desires and ambitions is part of the Yogic practice! The last unfortunately
is a common self-deception among many of us who claim to be disciples of Sri
Aurobindo and the Mother, thoroughly spoilt as we are by the total lack of
inner requirements in the Ashram in the absence of our Gurus.
The
process of deterioration which ends in this outright falsehood is gradual and goes
through several stages, mostly in the following sequence: One, when the young disciple
joins the Ashram with high aspirations and is ready to consecrate his (or her)
entire life at the service of the Divine. Two, when the disciple realises that
the Yoga is exceedingly difficult, far more difficult than he had ever
expected, and is faced with the shameful prospect of returning to his old life
that he had given up years ago. Three, when he looks round at the others and
realises humbly that he cannot do without compromises in the spiritual life. Four:
there is an abrupt normalisation, a relaxation, and the frustration of not
being able to do what one ought to do disappears, and there is a comfortable
settling down to the new found balance of one’s life, which is often temporary.
Five: Life hits back at him and takes its sweet revenge for having been suppressed
all these years and deprived of its normal course of physical satisfaction. The
balance then tilts to the other side once the inhibitions are broken, and there
is a demand for the full satisfaction of its basic instincts, without any reservations
whatsoever. Six: The Yogic aim is then indefinitely postponed, or fitted neatly
into a small corner of the larger framework of the ordinary life that one is
now forced to abide by. A daily visit to the Samadhi of the great Gurus, the
lighting of an incense stick and standing for a moment in prayerful silence in
front of their photographs, or the occasional attendance of the collective
meditation with the Mother’s voice, is all that now remains of the spiritual
life. At this point, the so-called disciple (who has been a resident of the
Ashram for, say, sixty years) makes the outlandish claim of being a Yogi Purush and of having practised the
Integral Yoga all his life. When you point out to him the huge discrepancy between
the teaching he is supposed to follow and the spiritual distortion he actually practises,
he brushes aside your objections and solemnly declares, “All Life is Yoga.” Personally,
I appreciate the more genuine disciple who frankly admits that he has fallen
between two stools, or says with a twinkle in the eye, “Yoga is for my next
life. This life let me enjoy myself!” In any case, I would not be too wrong if
I say that this, with a few permutations and combinations to account for the
variety of human nature, is the state of the majority of the present inmates of
the Ashram. Not many would disagree with me privately, but publicly I would be
condemned and vehemently criticised!
Truth well stated
ReplyDelete